[Firehol-support] [Firehol-devs] Proposed fork [Was:(no subject)]

[Alexander Wirt]

Phil Whineray schrieb am Saturday, den 31. March 2012:

> A quick update, we have a name: sanewall
> 
> Sorry to everyone who would have preferred something else. In my
> opinion this is the best that was availablewith a usable domain. There
> isn't any content on the site yet,
> expect that to come in the next couple of weeks:
>    http://www.sanewall.org/
> 
> Meantime, you can still what I'm doing with the code here:
>    https://github.com/philwhineray/firehol-fork
> 
> Once we have infrastructure in place, I'll post the details. A 1.0
> release should not be too far behind that - we will need testers for
> rpms and debs; if you can help out please drop me a line.
> 
> Thanks to Mauricio for the name suggestion and getting the domains
> registered and to everyone else who's been helping out.
Just a small tip: Please don't include debian/ in the release tarballs, its
always a problem for us debian maintainers to change a debian/ that is also
included upstream. You can move it to a specific branch, or strip it from
release tarballs.

Thanks

Alex