[Firehol-support] IPSec + Firehol
sebastiano at datafaber.net
Mon Jul 9 19:43:13 BST 2018
On 09/07/18 13:07, Viktor Remennik wrote:
> According to the docs, the 'firehol.conf' file is executed by the
> firehol as a shell script, so, any shell command can be added there.
> The problem is, that this workaround is not a firehol functionality
> and it's not possible to configure such things using firehol itself.
> Furthermore, it looks like the firehol is not supported anymore.
> That's why, I suppose, the best solution is to get rid of it. Dunno,
> probably in this situation it's better to move to the raw iptables.
What makes you say that? Is there any web page which explicitly states
that firehol isn't supported anymore?
More information about the Firehol-support