[Firehol-support] Firehol and Wondershaper or CBQ
rbelk at jam.rr.com
Mon Dec 19 19:35:51 GMT 2005
Carlos Rodrigues wrote:
>Well, I'm using my own script, which is available here:
>It does the same as Wondershaper but a bit better (IMHO, but I'm
>biased). It uses HTB (which is both simpler and more effective than
>CBQ), and I'm using it together with FireHOL (the tarball contains a
>firehol.conf snippet with the necessary rules).
>On 12/19/05, Randy Belk <rbelk at jam.rr.com> wrote:
>>I would like to shape traffic on my home network. What would be the best
>>way to do this with Firehole? Would using CBQ or Wondershaper be ok, or
>>would I need to add IPTABLE commands to firehol.conf?
Thanks Carlos, just what I was looking for. I think that this should be
included in the next version of Firehol or a web page that lists users
firehol additions. I am going to look into making some other additions
to firehol using the "source <script>" method.
More information about the Firehol-support