[Firehol-support] link-balancer: argument "0x" is wrong
Jonathan Baecker
jonbae77 at gmail.com
Tue May 9 21:03:37 BST 2017
Hello,
I have set up link-balancer, and it looks that everything is working,
but at the end I get this error:
- finalize_rules 4
# run /sbin/ip -4 rule show ... OK
# run /sbin/ip -4 rule del priority 1300 from all fwmark
0x4/0x3f lookup main ... OK
# run /sbin/ip -4 rule add priority 1300 from all fwmark
0x4/0x3f ... OK
# run /sbin/ip -4 rule add priority 1301 from all fwmark
0x/0x3f ... FAILED
Error: argument "0x" is wrong: fwmark value is invalid
WARNING 5@/var/run/link-balancer/temp-bRqL87gk43/rules.script.4:
lb_diff_rule: Command: '/sbin/ip -4 rule add priority 1301 from all
fwmark 0x/0x3f' exited with code 255.
# run /sbin/ip -4 rule add priority 1302 from all fwmark
0x/0x3f ... FAILED
Error: argument "0x" is wrong: fwmark value is invalid
WARNING 6@/var/run/link-balancer/temp-bRqL87gk43/rules.script.4:
lb_diff_rule: Command: '/sbin/ip -4 rule add priority 1302 from all
fwmark 0x/0x3f' exited with code 255.
The funny thing is, that I don't use this mark ID "0x". My config have
this settings:
gateway wangw1 dev ${dev1} gw ${gate1}
gateway wangw2 dev ${dev2} gw ${gate2}
gateway wlang4 dev ${dev4} gw ${gate4}
table wan1
default via wangw1
table wan2
default via wangw2
table main
default via wangw1 weight 250
fallback via wangw2
table wlanguest
default via wlang4
policy
connmark 0x1 table wan1
connmark 0x2 table wan2
connmark 0x4 talbe wlanguest
rules src 192.168.3.10 table wan2
rules dst 192.168.3.10 table wan2
rules scr gw-src-ips wlang4 table wan1
Is there any mistake in my config what cause this issue?
Regards,
Jonathan
More information about the Firehol-support
mailing list