[Firehol-devs] Migrate firehol from SF CVS to SF SVN?

[Alexander Wirt]

Thomas Arendsen Hein schrieb am Donnerstag, den 26. April 2007:

*snip* 
> A distributed SCM might be a better technical solution for this
> problem, because it makes it possible to ignore the social problem
> of giving not yet known people access to the central repository
> until you know you like their contributions.
> 
> As a co-developer of Mercurial I suggest Mercurial for this :)
Since I have been forced by the grml project and gebi to use Mercurial I
would agree here :). 

Thanks 
Alex (debian maintainer of firehol) 

-- 
Alexander Wirt, formorer at formorer.de 
CC99 2DDD D39E 75B0 B0AA  B25C D35B BC99 BC7D 020A
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.firehol.org/pipermail/firehol-devs/attachments/20070427/b1b37d84/attachment-0002.sig>